People question the Christian faith of Donald Trump or other politicians because they say that they see no evidence of their faith.
That is a valid argument.
Faith should have evidence that the Bible calls fruit. Even so, that fruit may be 'in season or out of season'. We have spiritual ups and downs, yet there should be evidence that remains.
The Bible tells us that one's claim to be a Christian is not enough if there is no fruit. Faith without works is dead. Even Satan believes and trembles, but he has no true fruit of the Spirit.
Yet the same people will NOT question when a man claims he's a woman. His claim of a female identity is enough (and vice -versa).
Where are the questions about proof? Are their allies not looking for evidence? Are they simply denying evidence such as DNA and clear biological indicators of male or female?
It is certainly easier to find evidence about male/female than it is to find or deny proof that someone is a Christian.
They make up a category called "gender" to avoid an evidence based approach to the topic.
Unlike spiritual fruit which can ripen or diminish at times, the biological evidence of male and female does not change with someone's self-perception.
In a twisted sort of way they say "Well this little boy gives 'evidence' of being a girl because he likes to play with dolls and wear pink and dress up etc" They are stereotyping male and female far worse than the 'hetero-patriarchy' ever did. And they hate the 'hetero-patriarchy.'
For years the feminists et al complained about 'gender stereotypes' yet when it comes to proving that a child is 'trans', they resort to the lowest level of stereotypes available. The hypocrisy is so clear yet ignored.
No comments:
Post a Comment